Search
Latest topics
Top posting users this month
No user |
Twitch Status
NFC North
Minnesota Vikings
Chicago Bears
Green Bay Packers
Detroit Lions
NFC East
Philadelphia Eagles
Dallas Cowboys
New York Giants
Washington Redskins
NFC South
Carolina Panthers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
New Orleans Saints
Atlanta Falcons
NFC West
Arizona Cardinals
Los Angeles Rams
Seattle Seahawks
San Francisco 49ers
AFC North
Pittsburgh Steelers
Cincinnatti Bengals
Baltimore Ravens
Cleveland Browns
AFC East
New England Patriots
Miami Dolphins
Buffalo Bills
New York Jets
AFC South
Tennessee Titans
Indianapolis Colts
Jacksonville Jaguars
Houston Texans
AFC West
Oakland Raiders
San Diego Chargers
Denver Broncos
Kansas City Chiefs
Minnesota Vikings
Chicago Bears
Green Bay Packers
Detroit Lions
NFC East
Philadelphia Eagles
Dallas Cowboys
New York Giants
Washington Redskins
NFC South
Carolina Panthers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
New Orleans Saints
Atlanta Falcons
NFC West
Arizona Cardinals
Los Angeles Rams
Seattle Seahawks
San Francisco 49ers
AFC North
Pittsburgh Steelers
Cincinnatti Bengals
Baltimore Ravens
Cleveland Browns
AFC East
New England Patriots
Miami Dolphins
Buffalo Bills
New York Jets
AFC South
Tennessee Titans
Indianapolis Colts
Jacksonville Jaguars
Houston Texans
AFC West
Oakland Raiders
San Diego Chargers
Denver Broncos
Kansas City Chiefs
Request for review of settings
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Request for review of settings
Hi
I'd like to take a few minutes to discuss something that I have noticed that I believe is wrong in terms of a setting and as a league I feel a stance must be taken to correct this.
Firstly this is from my observations and my opinion. I'm sure many people will tell me I'm wrong on this, as per the standard practice, however I'd really appreciate thoughts and constructive comments
Over the passed seasons I have notice a lot if not all users will have dynamic drive goal information displayed during their game. I believe this is set to on as default. For example it may advise that a WR will get more XP completing his X career catch, catch of the season etc. There are multiple variants of these some examples are "Turn up the heat: run two blitzes" and "Gain Rhythm: Get first down" (sometimes its multiple first downs) each awarding the team or individual players additional XP depending on the drive goal.
Im not sure if people will care to "confess" to focusing on these drive goals or not however I think the setting should be turned off. At no point IRL would a coach be encouraged to play a certain way to gain additional XP. In our league gaining additional XP by chasing these goals is padding XP and surely on the same level as stat padding
Turning the setting off should hold no bearing on how any one of us approach or play a game. The benefit of turning this off is that I'm sure there are individuals "better" at completing the dynamic drive goals and taking the additional XP
I have checked over the rules and see no official stance on this at present
Discuss................
FAO Admin. If this thread turns into a s**tfeast please lock or delete it. Thanks
I'd like to take a few minutes to discuss something that I have noticed that I believe is wrong in terms of a setting and as a league I feel a stance must be taken to correct this.
Firstly this is from my observations and my opinion. I'm sure many people will tell me I'm wrong on this, as per the standard practice, however I'd really appreciate thoughts and constructive comments
Over the passed seasons I have notice a lot if not all users will have dynamic drive goal information displayed during their game. I believe this is set to on as default. For example it may advise that a WR will get more XP completing his X career catch, catch of the season etc. There are multiple variants of these some examples are "Turn up the heat: run two blitzes" and "Gain Rhythm: Get first down" (sometimes its multiple first downs) each awarding the team or individual players additional XP depending on the drive goal.
Im not sure if people will care to "confess" to focusing on these drive goals or not however I think the setting should be turned off. At no point IRL would a coach be encouraged to play a certain way to gain additional XP. In our league gaining additional XP by chasing these goals is padding XP and surely on the same level as stat padding
Turning the setting off should hold no bearing on how any one of us approach or play a game. The benefit of turning this off is that I'm sure there are individuals "better" at completing the dynamic drive goals and taking the additional XP
I have checked over the rules and see no official stance on this at present
Discuss................
FAO Admin. If this thread turns into a s**tfeast please lock or delete it. Thanks
Bartell- All-Madden
- Posts : 943
Join date : 2017-01-26
Age : 43
Location : County Durham
Re: Request for review of settings
Also yes if this change is introduced and people are found to still have the setting on then action would be taken by commissioners to punish offenders
Bartell- All-Madden
- Posts : 943
Join date : 2017-01-26
Age : 43
Location : County Durham
Re: Request for review of settings
I think it's not worth a discussion as the gain is mostly nothing. If you get 100 XP from a game and maybe 1 point confidence, then that's everything. Personally I only take a few easy goals sometimes, but otherwise I don't look at them.
Don't think we have to discuss about 100 XP, if we still have stat padding for weekly and seasonal awards...
Don't think we have to discuss about 100 XP, if we still have stat padding for weekly and seasonal awards...
ParaAUT- All-Pro
- Posts : 367
Join date : 2017-03-27
Re: Request for review of settings
Personally, I turn them off as having them on would mean a less sim experience for me, but whether they are on or off is a minor issue in my eyes.
It is a computer game at the end of the day and asking people to adjust these settings from game to game if they prefer them on in other leagues is probably overkill. By default they are on and I'm sure the majority don't even notice them. Some will, but that may mean they force passes/carries to their own detriment.
It is a computer game at the end of the day and asking people to adjust these settings from game to game if they prefer them on in other leagues is probably overkill. By default they are on and I'm sure the majority don't even notice them. Some will, but that may mean they force passes/carries to their own detriment.
dwevans- All-Madden
- Posts : 535
Join date : 2017-01-28
Re: Request for review of settings
Good point as I do at times see myself trying to force a pass to a receiver at times when these dynamic goals pop up even if I don't want to pass the ball. I could take it or leave it as I don't think it gives much XP but it is at times a fun game within the game.
FaberAK- Rookie
- Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-08-21
Location : Italy
Re: Request for review of settings
I love it when you get a goal for a player who isn't even on the field...
Similar topics
» Sliders and Settings
» Jags CPB for review
» Post-Title Update 3 Settings & Sliders Feedback
» SML IV Playoff Review by Scoop McLeak
» Chargers Position change request
» Jags CPB for review
» Post-Title Update 3 Settings & Sliders Feedback
» SML IV Playoff Review by Scoop McLeak
» Chargers Position change request
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:09 am by Mattanite
» Cowboys positiion change
Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:07 am by zill_kills
» M20 Rams Position Changes
Sat Feb 15, 2020 10:00 am by Mattanite
» Season 34 Draft News
Tue Feb 04, 2020 9:25 am by Mattanite
» Haason Reddick position change
Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:48 pm by LTown27ers
» Bish Phone Broke
Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:59 pm by Mattanite
» VIKINGS POSITION CHANGE
Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:40 pm by Bartell
» Cowboys Scheme change to Hybrid
Fri Jan 10, 2020 7:04 pm by Bartell
» Packers Position Changes
Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:41 pm by Fazak